UPDATED: 03-20-26 14:37 PDT

pigskin SMU
  
SMU                   
W-L: ( 8- 4) PR = 85.2557

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 830 H East Tex A&M 42-13 906 H Baylor B12 ( 4- 8, 76.1) 45-48 913 A Missouri St ( 7- 5, 71.9) 28-10 920 A TCU B12 ( 8- 4, 85.2) 24-35 1004 H Syracuse ACC ( 3- 9, 71.7) 31-18 1011 H Stanford ACC ( 4- 8, 76.3) 34-10 1018 A Clemson ACC ( 7- 5, 82.3) 35-24 1025 A Wake Forest ACC ( 8- 4, 79.4) 12-13 1101 H Miami ACC (10- 2, 91.7) 26-20 1108 A Boston Col ` ACC ( 3- 9, 72.8) 45-13 1122 H Louisville ACC ( 8- 5, 84.2) 38- 6 1129 A California ACC ( 6- 6, 75.5) 35-38

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   906 H Baylor                 45-48      -3    12    ---  -14.84
   913 A Missouri St            28-10      18    11    +      3.37
   920 A TCU                    24-35     -11    -3    ---   -8.42
  1004 H Syracuse               31-18      13    16          -1.00
  1011 H Stanford               34-10      24    12    +      2.41
  1018 A Clemson                35-24      11     0    +++   10.69
  1025 A Wake Forest            12-13      -1     3    --    -4.15
  1101 H Miami                  26-20       6    -4    +++    9.76
  1108 A Boston Col   `         45-13      32    10    ++     4.19
  1122 H Louisville             38- 6      32     4    +++   10.30
  1129 A California             35-38      -3     7    ---  -10.04

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   906 H Baylor                 45-48      -3    12    ---  -14.84
   920 A TCU                    24-35     -11    -3    ---   -8.42
  1129 A California             35-38      -3     7    ---  -10.04
  1025 A Wake Forest            12-13      -1     3    --    -4.15

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
  1018 A Clemson                35-24      11     0    +++   10.69
  1101 H Miami                  26-20       6    -4    +++    9.76
  1122 H Louisville             38- 6      32     4    +++   10.30
  1108 A Boston Col   `         45-13      32    10    ++     4.19
   913 A Missouri St            28-10      18    11    +      3.37
  1011 H Stanford               34-10      24    12    +      2.41

SMU Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Boston Col ` SMU SMU  
California California California  
Clemson SMU SMU  
Duke Duke Duke   4- 0 vs 2- 2
Florida St SMU SMU   3- 1 vs 1- 3
Georgia Tech SMU insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 4- 0) SMU
Louisville SMU SMU  
Miami SMU SMU  
UNC SMU insuffient: ( 3- 3)( 2- 4) SMU
NC St SMU tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) SMU
Pittsburgh SMU SMU   5- 0 vs 3- 2
Stanford SMU SMU  
Syracuse SMU SMU  
Virginia SMU insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 3- 1) SMU
Va Tech SMU insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 1- 3) SMU
Wake Forest Wake Forest Wake Forest  
Army SMU   SMU
Charlotte SMU   SMU
Ea Carolina SMU   SMU
Fla Atlantic SMU   SMU
Memphis SMU   SMU
Navy SMU   SMU
No Texas SMU   SMU
Rice SMU   SMU
So Florida So Florida insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) So Florida
Temple SMU   SMU
Tulane SMU   SMU
Tulsa SMU   SMU
UAB SMU   SMU
UTSA SMU   SMU
Arizona Arizona insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Arizona
Arizona St Arizona St Arizona St   2- 0 vs 0- 2
BYU BYU insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) BYU
Baylor Baylor Baylor  
Cincinnati SMU insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) SMU
Colorado SMU tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) SMU
Houston SMU insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) SMU
Iowa St SMU insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) SMU
Kansas SMU   SMU
Kansas St SMU insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) SMU
Oklahoma St SMU insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) SMU
TCU TCU TCU  
Texas Tech Texas Tech   Texas Tech
UCF SMU tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) SMU
Utah Utah insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Utah
We Virginia SMU tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) SMU
Illinois SMU   SMU
Indiana Indiana   Indiana
Iowa Iowa   Iowa
Maryland SMU   SMU
Michigan Michigan   Michigan
Michigan St SMU tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) SMU
Minnesota SMU tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) SMU
Nebraska SMU   SMU
Northwestern SMU   SMU
Ohio St Ohio St   Ohio St
Oregon Oregon   Oregon
Penn St SMU   SMU
Purdue SMU   SMU
Rutgers SMU   SMU
UCLA SMU   SMU
USC USC tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) USC
Washington Washington   Washington
Wisconsin SMU   SMU
Florida Intl SMU insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) SMU
Jacksonv. St SMU   SMU
Kennesaw St SMU tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) SMU
Liberty SMU insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) SMU
La Tech SMU tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) SMU
Middle Tenn SMU insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) SMU
NM St SMU insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) SMU
SHouston St SMU   SMU
UTEP SMU insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) SMU
We Kentucky SMU tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) SMU
UMass SMU   SMU
Notre Dame Notre Dame insuffient: ( 4- 0)( 3- 1) Notre Dame
UConn SMU insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) SMU
Akron SMU   SMU
Ball St SMU   SMU
Bowl. Green SMU insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) SMU
Buffalo SMU   SMU
Cen Michigan SMU   SMU
Ea Michigan SMU   SMU
Kent State SMU   SMU
MiamiOH SMU   SMU
No Illinois SMU   SMU
Ohio SMU   SMU
Toledo SMU   SMU
We Michigan SMU   SMU
Air Force SMU   SMU
Boise State SMU   SMU
Colorado St SMU   SMU
Fresno St SMU   SMU
Hawaii SMU tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) SMU
Nevada SMU   SMU
New Mexico SMU   SMU
San Diego St SMU insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) SMU
San Jose St SMU insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) SMU
UNLV SMU   SMU
Utah St SMU   SMU
Wyoming SMU   SMU
Oregon St SMU tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) SMU
Wash St SMU   SMU
Alabama Alabama   Alabama
Arkansas SMU   SMU
Auburn SMU insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) SMU
Florida SMU insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) SMU
Georgia Georgia   Georgia
Kentucky SMU insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) SMU
LSU LSU tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) LSU
Missouri Missouri   Missouri
Miss St SMU   SMU
Oklahoma Oklahoma   Oklahoma
Ole Miss Ole Miss   Ole Miss
So Carolina SMU insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) SMU
Tennessee Tennessee tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Tennessee
Texas Texas   Texas
Texas A&M Texas A&M   Texas A&M
Vanderbilt Vanderbilt   Vanderbilt
App St SMU   SMU
Arkansas State SMU   SMU
Coastal Car SMU   SMU
Georgia So SMU   SMU
Georgia St SMU   SMU
J Madison SMU insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) SMU
Louisiana SMU   SMU
Marshall SMU insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) SMU
Old Dominion SMU   SMU
So Miss SMU   SMU
So Alabama SMU   SMU
Texas State SMU   SMU
Troy SMU insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) SMU
La-Monroe SMU   SMU
Delaware SMU tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) SMU
Missouri St SMU SMU  

PowerWise = 106


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 12.13

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H Baylor          ( 4- 8, 76.1)    45-48      -23.81      23.34      -2.67         1.10           -14.61
   0 A Missouri St     ( 7- 5, 71.9)    28-10      -27.95      19.20       2.67         1.10            48.24
   0 A TCU             ( 8- 4, 85.2)    24-35      -14.74      32.41       2.67         1.10            -6.65
   0 H Syracuse        ( 3- 9, 71.7)    31-18      -28.22      18.93      -2.67         1.10            35.86
   0 H Stanford        ( 4- 8, 76.3)    34-10      -23.56      23.59      -2.67         1.10            46.13
   0 A Clemson         ( 7- 5, 82.3)    35-24      -17.63      29.52       2.67         1.10            71.01
   0 A Wake Forest     ( 8- 4, 79.4)    12-13      -20.47      26.68       2.67         1.10            -9.81
   0 H Miami           (10- 2, 91.7)    26-20       -8.21      38.94      -2.67         1.10            79.99
   0 A Boston Col   `  ( 3- 9, 72.8)    45-13      -27.13      20.02       2.67         1.10            50.07
   0 H Louisville      ( 8- 5, 84.2)    38- 6      -15.67      31.48      -2.67         1.10            63.54
   0 A California      ( 6- 6, 75.5)    35-38      -24.36      22.79       2.67         1.10           -11.96
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       351.81

winning pts = 394.8408 losing points = -43.0346

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------